Famous naina SAHNI tandoor murder case from the Supreme Court decision on Tuesday will rule. wife naina SAHNI murder crime punishable by death in the former President of the Delhi Youth Congress found Sushil Sharma has appealed to the Supreme Court against its sentence. Sharma is in prison since 1995.
Sushil Sharma, naina's suspected illegal ties in 1995 gunned. then he naina bodies of Delhi tried to burn in a restaurant tandoor. during this case was open, and police recovered the bodies from the tandoor was naina's adhjala restaurant manager keshav Kumar was arrested on the spotWhile Sharma's arrest a few days later.
The sessions Court and the Delhi High Court Sharma was sentenced to death. the Supreme Court may 7, 2007, to accept the appeal for Sharma's punishment was barred by Sharma on interim Supreme Court death penalty to put in replacement guhar rs5. satshivam Sharma's petition but the main judge's decision back sanjay headed.
During the debate in Sharma's punishment slapping guhar senior advocates of the rs5 Jaspal Singh argued that the case durlabhtam crime (resort of rear) do not give justice to the death penalty, so he is not compatible.
He said that the whole case is based on circumstantial evidence because there cannot be a death sentence. top court decision last August to keep your secure.
Sushil Sharma, naina's suspected illegal ties in 1995 gunned. then he naina bodies of Delhi tried to burn in a restaurant tandoor. during this case was open, and police recovered the bodies from the tandoor was naina's adhjala restaurant manager keshav Kumar was arrested on the spotWhile Sharma's arrest a few days later.
The sessions Court and the Delhi High Court Sharma was sentenced to death. the Supreme Court may 7, 2007, to accept the appeal for Sharma's punishment was barred by Sharma on interim Supreme Court death penalty to put in replacement guhar rs5. satshivam Sharma's petition but the main judge's decision back sanjay headed.
During the debate in Sharma's punishment slapping guhar senior advocates of the rs5 Jaspal Singh argued that the case durlabhtam crime (resort of rear) do not give justice to the death penalty, so he is not compatible.
He said that the whole case is based on circumstantial evidence because there cannot be a death sentence. top court decision last August to keep your secure.
